Men's UA Original Series 9” Boxerjock®

73
Style # 1277240
$30.00 AUD
Height: Size: Fit: Fitted
    • Color: Gray (025)
Size and Fit Guide
Due to limited quantities, only 10 allowed per customer.
The product can't be added to the bag
Height: Size: Fit: Fitted
Men's UA Original Series 9” Boxerjock®

Alternate Views

Product DNA

Ask any guy who‘s tried them—nothing beats UA Underwear. They stretch, recover, stay put, wick sweat, and keep you cool.
  • Fitted: Next-to-skin without the squeeze
  • Lightweight, smooth HeatGear® fabric & articulated mesh fly panel
  • 4-way stretch construction moves better in every direction
  • Material wicks sweat & dries really fast
  • Anti-odor technology prevents the growth of odor-causing microbes
  • Performance waistband
  • Working fly
  • Inseam: 9"
  • 90% Polyester/10% Elastane
  • Imported
Share

FEATURED TECHNOLOGY

This is what makes our gear work harder—and smarter—than anything else out there.

HEATGEAR® WEAR THIS TO FEEL COOL, DRY & LIGHT.

The original innovation our founder dreamed up. This super-breathable fabric wicks sweat and regulates body temperature so you feel cooler, drier, and lighter than ever.

Review Summary

73 Reviews
1.9

Size

Runs small Runs large

Comfort

Min. Max.

Performance

Min. Max.

What happened to my favorite training under layer?

I’ve had variations of the boxer jocks for years and years, always happy to return to them. That is until the last set. I was happy with the fit, and pretty content with the comfort - the problem was that they’ve barely lasted. Apparently... they're not made for training. Both the seat and the crotch elastic have completely disintegrated over just a few months’ time, barely still standing. Would not recommend them if you’re looking for a bottom layer that will last for more than 6-7 months.

Extremely disappointed the Original 9" Cupron BoxerJocks are no longer available

Sadly I only have two pair of the Original 9" Cupron BoxerJocks. I've invested in 15+ pairs of UA BoxerJocks, but none holds a candle to the fit and feel provided by the original. See from reading most of the reviews for the current replacement, that many if not most, have provided UA with sound advice - "Bring back the Original 9" Cupron BoxerJocks". I endorse this solution.

Not Original!

I have to agree with a majority of the reviewers here that the sizing is OFF. Too large in the waist and a bit snug around the thighs....disappointed but will keep them since i wear them primarily for tennis.....Why did UA mess with a perfectly good fit????

thought i was crazy

I've been wearing UA underwear for several years now. I've tried to purchase several new pairs of underwear and found the the legs are extremely too tight and the waist was floppy and would slide down if i bent over. I thought it was because I gained wait and my old pairs were just worn and stretched out or the different colors were made different. After reading the reviews on this page I realized that it wasn't me, it was the company. They must have redesigned the underwear. I'm extremely disappointed the old product was awesome, comfortable and lasted years, now I have to find another company to switch to that fits properly and comfortably.

Should have listened to the other poor reviews

I have loved these underwear in the past and have at least 8 pairs. As my older underwear wore out I was replacing them with these. Unfortunately, as the previous reviews have mentioned, the new ones I received pull down at the back in an uncomfortable way. My wife says they must have "shortened the rise". These are now, in my opinion, a terrible product not deserving of any good review. I product I loved has let me down and now I have to search for another brand of underwear to replace them. I am returning the pairs I received. Very disappointing.

If I could, I would give it ZERO STARS

I have been wearing these boxer jocks for about 10ish years with no issues... About a year or so ago I bought a few pairs at the store... I noticed the waist bands were bigger and kind of floppy. They were also tight in the leg but not in the butt area... Oh well must have been a fluke. Good thing my old pairs are so durable. Fast forward to a week ago and now I order 3 pairs online. I got them in the mail yesterday and... Turns out it wasn't a fluke. Same exact problem. The waist band is over an inch bigger than my old ones, but the size guides have not changed... I didn't even bother trying to wash them to see if they shrink... Back in the mail they will go... Hopefully you guys come to your senses and go back to the old design. Judging by over HALF of the reviews here, this product sucks... In the mean time, I will be taking my business elsewhere... With so many companies offering a similar product UA better get it together.

Don't Fit

So after reading the reviews I decided to purchase for myself (all 3 colors). I have never brought Under Armour underwear before or tired them on. I liked the colors and the fell on my thighs. The underwear was very comfortable in the thigh area as that is a major issue I have. The issue I found with all 3 pair of underwear is that the butt area is small (tucked in) and the band in the back area pulls down. Therefore my butt is hanging out of the pants and this is standing up. So sitting down, bending over, or excising is out the question. If this issue could be fixed the underwear would be the best!

Skimping on Previous Quality

I have to agree with many of the reviews on this product. I have been wearing these since they first started making them in the mid-2000s. I still have pairs I own pre-2010 and the waistband elastic holds up and fits snug around the waist with little to no movement. Recent purchases of this "same" product have left me disappointed due to the drop in quality on the waistband. Current models waistbands are much looser and do not fit nearly as well. While I understand the lower quality may have increased revenue for now, you will gradually lose your loyal customers if this is how you wanna play it. Makes me sad, because I genuinely loved these. The only underwear for me for nearly a decade.

Fantastic Underwear....If you don't get Grey.

So this is probably the oddest item UA sells. Most of the reviews here are extremely critical of it, saying UA has changed the blueprints. They've tapered the rear so there's not enough room for your butt, tightened the fabric so it doesn't stretch or breathe as well, and the thigh exits are too tight even for people that skip leg day. I'm here to tell you that after a lot of experimentation with these, all of these criticisms are real... but only for the Carbon Heather color. For some reason the Black/Red color has the original product design. It isn't too tight but doesn't ever slip, the inseam is snug but stretches to make plenty of room without pressure, the rear is ample enough and the thigh exits are comfortable and don't mess with your circulation. I own Carbon Heather pairs as well, and they're a nightmare. Under Armour PLEASE fix the product inconsistency between your colors and PLEASE add in an Academy or Midnight Navy color version for those of us that want the best-feeling underwear in sleek colors that don't jump out at you like the Ambulance-Red waistband on these. P.S. I haven't worn the True Gray Heather/Red color so I can't contest to its comfort.

Not Original. At all

I have 10 pairs of these from about 7 or 8 years ago. They fit great and are the most comfortable underwear I have ever worn. A few pairs are starting to show some wear so I bought new ones.and threw them straight in the garbage.They are the most uncomfortable ill-fitting things I have ever seen. They are nothing at all like the originals. I am pretty thin, 6" 2" and about 170 lbs with a 31" waist. These new ones are so tight on the thighs that I cannot wear them. Then the waist is so loose that they almost fall down. I don't know who these things are supposed to fit , but trust me, I do not have large thighs, I am pretty much built like a No. 2 pencil. I guess I should start eating more dessert and then the waist might fit. I am really disappointed with Under Armour as of late. I have a lot of older stuff but I don't see myself buying a lot in the future.