Free Shipping on all orders $49+ & FREE Returns
HIPS: With your feet together, measure around the fullest part of your hips to ensure you’ll have enough room to move comfortably.
Ultra-tight, second-skin fit that keeps you locked in.
A slimmer, athletic cut that allows total mobility but eliminates the bulk of extra fabric.
Fuller cut for complete comfort, total range of motion & greater breathability.
You must be logged in to share by email.
The original innovation our founder dreamed up. This super-breathable fabric wicks sweat and regulates body temperature so you feel cooler, drier, and lighter than ever.
You know sometimes you read reviews and think people exaggerate.. well this isn't that time. I read the reviews before buying and thought to myself: well they can't be that uncomfortable...
They are. Im an arborist and wear chainsaw protective pants most of the time. They are hot and uncomfortable and some pairs chafe the inside of my thighs. Was looking for a good pair of boxers long enough to protect me. These are long enough and have kept the chafing at bay. Unfortunately they are really uncomfortable. Itchy even. I do not recommend.
I purchased the original UA 9" boxers a few years ago from my local sports store. I really liked the quality and feel. Recently (past year or so), I have purchased a few of the UA 9" boxers from the UA online store and unfortunately the quality & comfort are not the same as the prior UA boxers I acquired. Please reconsider the type of materials used for this particular item. Thank you,
I’ve had variations of the boxer jocks for years and years, always happy to return to them.
That is until the last set. I was happy with the fit, and pretty content with the comfort - the problem was that they’ve barely lasted. Apparently... they're not made for training.
Both the seat and the crotch elastic have completely disintegrated over just a few months’ time, barely still standing. Would not recommend them if you’re looking for a bottom layer that will last for more than 6-7 months.
Sadly I only have two pair of the Original 9" Cupron BoxerJocks. I've invested in 15+ pairs of UA BoxerJocks, but none holds a candle to the fit and feel provided by the original. See from reading most of the reviews for the current replacement, that many if not most, have provided UA with sound advice - "Bring back the Original 9" Cupron BoxerJocks". I endorse this solution.
I have to agree with a majority of the reviewers here that the sizing is OFF. Too large in the waist and a bit snug around the thighs....disappointed but will keep them since i wear them primarily for tennis.....Why did UA mess with a perfectly good fit????
I've been wearing UA underwear for several years now. I've tried to purchase several new pairs of underwear and found the the legs are extremely too tight and the waist was floppy and would slide down if i bent over. I thought it was because I gained wait and my old pairs were just worn and stretched out or the different colors were made different. After reading the reviews on this page I realized that it wasn't me, it was the company. They must have redesigned the underwear. I'm extremely disappointed the old product was awesome, comfortable and lasted years, now I have to find another company to switch to that fits properly and comfortably.
I have loved these underwear in the past and have at least 8 pairs. As my older underwear wore out I was replacing them with these. Unfortunately, as the previous reviews have mentioned, the new ones I received pull down at the back in an uncomfortable way. My wife says they must have "shortened the rise". These are now, in my opinion, a terrible product not deserving of any good review. I product I loved has let me down and now I have to search for another brand of underwear to replace them. I am returning the pairs I received. Very disappointing.
I have been wearing these boxer jocks for about 10ish years with no issues... About a year or so ago I bought a few pairs at the store... I noticed the waist bands were bigger and kind of floppy. They were also tight in the leg but not in the butt area... Oh well must have been a fluke. Good thing my old pairs are so durable.
Fast forward to a week ago and now I order 3 pairs online. I got them in the mail yesterday and... Turns out it wasn't a fluke. Same exact problem. The waist band is over an inch bigger than my old ones, but the size guides have not changed... I didn't even bother trying to wash them to see if they shrink... Back in the mail they will go... Hopefully you guys come to your senses and go back to the old design. Judging by over HALF of the reviews here, this product sucks...
In the mean time, I will be taking my business elsewhere... With so many companies offering a similar product UA better get it together.
So after reading the reviews I decided to purchase for myself (all 3 colors). I have never brought Under Armour underwear before or tired them on. I liked the colors and the fell on my thighs. The underwear was very comfortable in the thigh area as that is a major issue I have. The issue I found with all 3 pair of underwear is that the butt area is small (tucked in) and the band in the back area pulls down. Therefore my butt is hanging out of the pants and this is standing up. So sitting down, bending over, or excising is out the question. If this issue could be fixed the underwear would be the best!
I have to agree with many of the reviews on this product. I have been wearing these since they first started making them in the mid-2000s. I still have pairs I own pre-2010 and the waistband elastic holds up and fits snug around the waist with little to no movement. Recent purchases of this "same" product have left me disappointed due to the drop in quality on the waistband. Current models waistbands are much looser and do not fit nearly as well. While I understand the lower quality may have increased revenue for now, you will gradually lose your loyal customers if this is how you wanna play it. Makes me sad, because I genuinely loved these. The only underwear for me for nearly a decade.