Men's Charged Cotton® Stretch 6” Boxerjock® – 3-Pack

40
Style # 1277279
$60.00 AUD
Height: Size: Fit: Fitted
Size and Fit Guide
Due to limited quantities, only 10 allowed per customer.
The product can't be added to the bag
Height: Size: Fit: Fitted
Men's Charged Cotton® Stretch 6” Boxerjock® – 3-Pack

Alternate Views

Product DNA

  • Fitted: Next-to-skin without the squeeze
  • Charged Cotton® fabric has the comfort of cotton, but dries much faster
  • 4-way stretch construction moves better in every direction
  • Material wicks sweat & dries really fast
  • Working fly
  • Inseam: 6"
  • 3 boxer briefs per pack
  • 57% Cotton/38% Polyester/5% Elastane
  • Imported
Share

Review Summary

40 Reviews
3.9

Size

Runs small Runs large

Comfort

Min. Max.

Performance

Min. Max.

Comfortable!!

These are a must buy in my opinion. They are extremely comfortable and the elastic bands last.

Waistband woes

Same issue I think that several others have commented on. Shorts are very comfortable and fit well, but after about 6 months or so, the waistband looses it's elasticity and becomes stretched and deformed. Without a tight fitting, stretchy waistband, these trunks essentially become useless. I've purchased a lot of Under Armour clothing and the quality has always been excellent. I've got to believe there is some manufacturing defect in the band itself - - Will Under Armour address this issue? - - I've thrown out a number of trunks already and I've found another supplier of similar fitting trunks. Would like to come back to Under Armour if this problem gets fixed though...

First Time Buyer

I am a devoted user of UA products. I decided to purchase the charged cotton Stretch 6 in. Box jock underwear. The size and feel of material was perfect. The only thing that is trouble some is the waist band. I have read several reviews on this and now I have to agree with some reviews. You are constantly having to pull them up and if you bend over they will slide down your backside. That is sad because the underwear is about 95% perfect. I would like to know if UA is considering any changes in this product in the future and how customers would know if changes were made. I have also noted in stores that carry UA underwear that Charged Cotton is never available.

Please bring back the old design!!

I work in the natural gas industry so cotton is the only underwear I wear (in case of flash fires) I have been buying the charged cotton for years and loved them, then they changed the waistband and they aren’t near as good. PLEASE BRING BACK THE OLD STYLE!!

Not at all for athletic builds

These underwear are not made for anyone with anything resembling an "athletic" body. The waist-to-leg ratio is completely off. The legs are way too tight compared to a very loose waistband. So I'd say they run too large and too small at the same time. Keep in mind that as athletes go I am completely in the normal spectrum and these don't fit well, so I can't image someone with an even more impressive waist-to-leg ratio. It is very disappointing because when I think Under Armour, I think about athletic wear. But these underwear seem to be designed for the sedentary, skinny-fat American male.

Waistband is prone to failure

I've been buying the charged cotton packs for years and loved them, but I'm really disappointed with the new design. The other reviewers are correct in saying that the elastic waistband is totally ineffective. They slide down during the day with movement, forcing me to pull them back up several times. Extremely annoying, especially when working out and constantly having to worry about them sliding too low. They also sit low on the waist to begin with compared to the previous design, making malfunctions even more likely. The material is comfortable and the design in theory is cool, but these are not performing the way they should at all. Very disappointed in them.

Garbage

Very disappointed! Not very comfortable and rides low, always pulling them up! Not the quality I normally expect from Under Armour.

Boxers

Excellent very comfortable fits like a glove very snug feel excellent durable material

Why did they remove most of the waist band elastic?

I used to like UA underwear, but they no longer have adequate elastic in the waistband. They would probably be fine if you had a plump rear, but I don't and these shorts literally fall off under my cloths. They use to have an adequate waistband and didn't slip, this is a recent degradation in quality.

Comfortable but with a small problem...

...they tend to slide down in the back sometimes and give me just a little less coverage than I need. But it doesn't happen often, thankfully. Other than that these are perfect. I really don't want to go back to loose boxers after wearing them.